<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ann Coulter attacks President Bush for being a wuss re: Roberts so do I re: Islam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pierrelegrand.net/2005/07/28/ann-coulter-attacks-president-bush-for-being-a-wuss-re-roberts-so-do-i-re-islam.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pierrelegrand.net/2005/07/28/ann-coulter-attacks-president-bush-for-being-a-wuss-re-roberts-so-do-i-re-islam.htm</link>
	<description>A Common Man Looks at the War on Islamic Terror</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pierre Legrand&#8217;s Pink Flamingo Bar &#187; What it takes to win a war&#8230;and why is this a mystery?</title>
		<link>http://pierrelegrand.net/2005/07/28/ann-coulter-attacks-president-bush-for-being-a-wuss-re-roberts-so-do-i-re-islam.htm#comment-19579</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre Legrand&#8217;s Pink Flamingo Bar &#187; What it takes to win a war&#8230;and why is this a mystery?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 19:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pierrelegrand.net/?p=1739#comment-19579</guid>
		<description>[...] None of us have the feeling that we stand at the gates of our village defending ourselves from an enemy bent on destroying us and our families. This became evident when we wasted time against our enemy debating how we treat them. Instead of devising better ways of murdering his troops, his support, and bringing woe to his families to break his will,&#160;we spent time discussing how we handled his books. We wasted time discussing amongst ourselves whether we should read him his Miranda warning. We&#160;at one point even had the President of the United States and his Sec. of Defense debating what we should call this war&#8230;whether it was a war against Islamic Fundamentalism or a War on Terror or merely a war against Extremism. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] None of us have the feeling that we stand at the gates of our village defending ourselves from an enemy bent on destroying us and our families. This became evident when we wasted time against our enemy debating how we treat them. Instead of devising better ways of murdering his troops, his support, and bringing woe to his families to break his will,&nbsp;we spent time discussing how we handled his books. We wasted time discussing amongst ourselves whether we should read him his Miranda warning. We&nbsp;at one point even had the President of the United States and his Sec. of Defense debating what we should call this war&#8230;whether it was a war against Islamic Fundamentalism or a War on Terror or merely a war against Extremism. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Powell</title>
		<link>http://pierrelegrand.net/2005/07/28/ann-coulter-attacks-president-bush-for-being-a-wuss-re-roberts-so-do-i-re-islam.htm#comment-593</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 03:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pierrelegrand.net/?p=1739#comment-593</guid>
		<description>Blessed right!!  Thank you for the eloquent confirmation of the obvious. Please visit http://www.protesting-islam.com and support our petition drives!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blessed right!!  Thank you for the eloquent confirmation of the obvious. Please visit <a href="http://www.protesting-islam.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.protesting-islam.com</a> and support our petition drives!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cutler</title>
		<link>http://pierrelegrand.net/2005/07/28/ann-coulter-attacks-president-bush-for-being-a-wuss-re-roberts-so-do-i-re-islam.htm#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator>Cutler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pierrelegrand.net/?p=1739#comment-592</guid>
		<description>*could = can</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*could = can</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cutler</title>
		<link>http://pierrelegrand.net/2005/07/28/ann-coulter-attacks-president-bush-for-being-a-wuss-re-roberts-so-do-i-re-islam.htm#comment-591</link>
		<dc:creator>Cutler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2005 01:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pierrelegrand.net/?p=1739#comment-591</guid>
		<description>While sitting in an office today I picked up one of the latest US News and World Reports, supposedly featuring an outline of the new 50 page War on Terror document on strategy. That article quoted the strategy as targeting specifically "Islamic extremism," not merely "extremism." It also stated that we were going to widen the war by going after more Islamic organizations, instead of focusing so much on Al Qaeda itself. I take this to mean we're treating this like the global Islamic insurgency it is, with Al Qaeda being the godfather of the local movements.

It was just US News and World Reports, though, so I'd have to read the real document to judge it.

True to MSM form it stated a number of times that this meant a change from "unilateralism," as if we aren't already been working with any government we could [from Niger to the Phillipines]. They must think the government/military are as one-dimensional as they are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While sitting in an office today I picked up one of the latest US News and World Reports, supposedly featuring an outline of the new 50 page War on Terror document on strategy. That article quoted the strategy as targeting specifically &#8220;Islamic extremism,&#8221; not merely &#8220;extremism.&#8221; It also stated that we were going to widen the war by going after more Islamic organizations, instead of focusing so much on Al Qaeda itself. I take this to mean we&#8217;re treating this like the global Islamic insurgency it is, with Al Qaeda being the godfather of the local movements.</p>
<p>It was just US News and World Reports, though, so I&#8217;d have to read the real document to judge it.</p>
<p>True to MSM form it stated a number of times that this meant a change from &#8220;unilateralism,&#8221; as if we aren&#8217;t already been working with any government we could [from Niger to the Phillipines]. They must think the government/military are as one-dimensional as they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://pierrelegrand.net/2005/07/28/ann-coulter-attacks-president-bush-for-being-a-wuss-re-roberts-so-do-i-re-islam.htm#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pierrelegrand.net/?p=1739#comment-590</guid>
		<description>I think we need more Tancredo attitudes.  I can't stand political correctness. 

Would you do me a favor? Would you update your link to me?  We are now at http://www.stoptheaclu.com
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we need more Tancredo attitudes.  I can&#8217;t stand political correctness. </p>
<p>Would you do me a favor? Would you update your link to me?  We are now at <a href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.stoptheaclu.com</a><br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: snorpht fingerpoot</title>
		<link>http://pierrelegrand.net/2005/07/28/ann-coulter-attacks-president-bush-for-being-a-wuss-re-roberts-so-do-i-re-islam.htm#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>snorpht fingerpoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 02:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pierrelegrand.net/?p=1739#comment-589</guid>
		<description>snorphty sez:

takes him out unt shootz him</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>snorphty sez:</p>
<p>takes him out unt shootz him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
