Pierre Legrand's Pink Flamingo Bar

(Updated with Bob Owens Interview)
The title of this post is a partial quote from FBI Operative and Army veteran Larry Grathwohl who infiltrated the Weather Underground combined with an observation of my wife. It was question to Billy Ayers, Bernadette Dohrn and other Weathermen during a conversation about what they envisioned the United States would look like after they won the war. Yes he confirms that Billy Ayers, a person Obama called a guy in his neighborhood, was in the room when this was said: (thank you to Bob Owens from Confederate Yankee for a terrific article and to Pajama Media for hosting it!)

I asked, �Well what is going to happen to those people we can�t reeducate, that are diehard capitalists?� And the reply was that they�d have to be eliminated.

And when I pursued this further, they estimated they would have to eliminate 25 million people in these reeducation centers.

And when I say �eliminate,� I mean �kill.�

Twenty-five million people.

I want you to imagine sitting in a room with 25 people, most of which have graduate degrees, from Columbia and other well-known educational centers, and hear them figuring out the logistics for the elimination of 25 million people.

And they were dead serious.

Here is a link to the video of this FBI Operative who was responsible for breaking up several attempts by these �guys from Obama�s neighborhood� to kill people. I provide this line because I know how unbelievable all of this is. I ask you again what if the left put up a candidate so outrageously dangerous that no one would believe the stories about that candidate. We would be depending on the press to dig into that person to expose them�how has the press done so far regarding Obama? A person that even those who have been with him for months call a cipher?

As chilling as you might find that incredible conversation it gets worse, consider this snippet from another seemingly unrelated book, The Perestroika Deception by Anatoliy Golitsyn. This is from page 34 inside a discussion of the strategic objectives of the Soviet Union.

• Secondly securing the victory of the radical Left in the next presidential elections in 1992 (Ed: yes the time frame is incorrect but read on) in the United States and the victory of the Socialist and Labour parties in the national elections in West Germany, France and Britain in the 1990�s. (snipped for brevity further on in the same paragraph) In their (Soviets) assessment, the Left will be prepared to carry out and accelerate restructuring in the United States.
• The Soviet strategists believe that an economic depression in the United States would provide even more favourable conditions for the execution of their strategy. In that event, the Soviets and their allies would shift to the doctrine of class struggle and try to divide the Western nations along crude class lines.
• The final period of restructuring in the United States and Western Europe would be accompanied, not only by the physical extermination of active anti Communists, but also by the extermination of the political, military, financial and religious elites. Blood would be spilled and the political re-education camps would be introduced. The Communists would not hesitate to repeat the mass repressions of their revolution in 1917, of the Soviet occupation of Eastern Europe in the Second World War or of the Chinese Communist victory of 1949.
• This time, they would resort to mass repressions in order to prevent any possibility of revolt by the defeated, and to make their victory final. The Author bases this conclusion in part on the following information. While the long-range strategy was being formulated in the late 1950�s, the Soviet strategists asked for a KGB estimate of the number of West Germans would need to be isolated in order to turn West Germany into a neutral country. The KGB estimate was 150,000 Germans.

Now back to Larry Grathwohl and his description of the training that the Weather Underground received.

Grathwohl: Most of the people that had no prior experience, let’s say the average Weatherman, if there is such a thing, they were sent to Cuba for training in Cuba. When the Venceremos Brigades were first being organized, I had a part in that, myself and a guy named Robert Burlingham were assigned the responsibility for organizing the first and second Venceremos Brigade in Ohio. I was told at that time that the only reason that the Venceremos Brigade existed was so that the Weathermen could send people and other terrorist organizations in the United States could send people to Cuba for training. Also, Tri?Continental played a significant role in Weathermen activities, the leadership was in constant contact with Tricontinentale and that particular organization is funded by the DGI. I was told after my experience with the Weathermen that many of the people sent to Cuba on the Venceremos Brigade were approached by agents of the DGI and I also know that the DGI is controlled by the KGB.�

In case you are wondering who Anatoliy Golitsyn is please refer to this off the back cover.

From the backcover: “Anatoliy Golitsyn’s first book, ‘New Lies for Old’, caused a long running sensation when it was discovered that, unlike most Western analysts, the Author had accurately predicted, some years ahead of the events, the ‘Break with the Past’ which took place in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union in 1989-91. In his book ‘Wedge: The Secret War between the FBI and CIA’ [Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1994], Mark Riebling, who carried out a methodical analysis of Golitsyn’s predictions in ‘New Lies for Old’, credited the Author with ‘an accuracy record of nearly 94%’. This singular achievement puts all other analysts, including some official services, to shame; and it is precisely because of his record of pin-point accuracy that Western Governments, policymakers and even some intelligence services, whose record bears little comparison with Golitysn’s, have competed with one another over the years to find reasons why Golitsyn’s perceptive explanations of Soviet strategy should be ignored. But events as they unfold are relentlessly proving this remarkable analyst of Soviet strategy to be right. ‘The Perestroika Deception’ explains the devious secret intent behind the Leninist strategy which the ‘former’ Communists are pursuing under cover of fake ‘reform’ and ‘progress towards democracy’. The immediate strategic objective is ‘convergence’ with the West — on their terms, not ours. The ultimate objective is Lenin’s: replacement of nations states with collective regional governments as building blocks of the ‘New World Social Order’ — World [Communist] Government.”

About the Author: Anatoliy Golitsyn was born in the Ukraine in 1926, served as a member of the KGB in various intelligence, counterintelligence, and counterespionage roles, until he defected to the United States in 1961 of which he is now a citizen. Since that time he has diligently studied Communist and international affairs, reading both the Western and Communist press which has lead him to submit Memoranda to the CIA outlining his analysis of Communist affairs.

From Bob Owens excellent article, Eyewitness to the Ayers Revolution,�at PJ Media a snippet of his interview with the FBI Operative who infiltrated the Weather Underground.

Larry Grathwohl: The instructions I received from Billy Ayers was that the bombs to be used in Detroit must have shrapnel (fence staples, specifically) and fire potential (propane bottles). The intention was to kill police officers.

Pajamas Media: One of the Detroit bombs was to be placed on the side of the DPOA building, and the blast was likely to cause damage to the adjacent Red Barn Restaurant, which had mostly African-American customers. Who ordered the attack, and what did he say when you told him that innocent civilians would be killed?

Larry Grathwohl: When I objected to Billy Ayers that more innocent people would be killed in the restaurant, he replied, �Innocent people have to die in a revolution.� Billy also acknowledged during a criticism session in Buffalo that Bernadine placed the bomb at the Park Police Station which resulted in the death of Police Officer McDonnell.

Pajamas Media: Bill Ayers came out of hiding around 1980, became an college professor, and has served on numerous boards and foundations. Do you think he�s changed in his radicalism?

Larry Grathwohl: Has Billy changed? I hardly think so.

Pajamas Media: If conditions permitted, do you think Ayers would still engage in violence to further a political agenda?

Larry Grathwohl: He has acknowledged his support of anti-American groups and stated he felt that the Weathermen hadn�t done enough.

Pajamas Media: Do you consider Bill Ayers an attempted mass murderer?

Larry Grathwohl: I�m not certain Billy is a mass murder; his ego just wants him to be in charge. Note that Billy never does anything that involves risk. He has no problem allowing his women to do the evil task, Diane Oughton and even Bernardine, but never him. As for what he might do, hasn�t he said he doesn�t rule out the possibility of future bombings? [Ayers said he didn't "want to discount the possibility" in this New York Times article from� September 11, 2001. -- Ed.]

Pajamas Media: Would you let your children attend a college or university class taught by Ayers or his wife, Bernadine Dohrn? What would you tell parents who have had their children exposed to Ayers� academic programs, like the Small Schools Workshop?

Larry Grathwohl: As for Billy�s ideas on education, isn�t it apparent? Reading, writing, and arithmetic aren�t important! Radicalism is what�s important. Fits right in with the Billy Ayers view of creating mindless soldiers to follow his commands � where best to lay the foundations of a revolution than with the young?

Pajamas Media: Do you think there is there any way that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama could not have known that Bill Ayers was a domestic terrorist? Is there any reason that the American people should accept Barack Obama�s newest excuse about his relationship with Bill Ayers, where Obama claimed that he thought Ayers was �reformed�?

Larry Grathwohl: If we are to believe Mr. Obama, he just didn�t know Billy was as radical as he apparently is. Really? Just like he didn�t know the Rev. Wright was as radical as he is? Obama is a politician and he wants me to believe that he never discussed politics with the Rev Wright or Billy Ayers?

From Obama�s Fight the Smears website:

� Ayers was never convicted of a crime. He went on to earn a doctorate, write 14 books and earn the distinction of �Senior University Scholar� and �Distinguished Professor.� People grow and evolve. It is no surprise that University of Chicago Law Professor Obama would cross paths with Ayers in civic organizations as well as in their neighborhood of Hyde Park.

Obama says that Ayers was:

�A guy who lives in my neighborhood who is a professor of English.�

We know for a fact that from 1995 to 1999 they worked together on �education� that just served as a convenient way to spread money they didn�t earn around to left wing organizations. Organizations that are now helping him in this election.

Here is Obama in his own words describing his associations in college.

To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets. We smoked cigarettes and wore leather jackets. At night, in the dorms, we discussed neocolonialism, Franz Fanon, Eurocentrism and patriarchy.

Sure these would be harmless if this were a mere dalliance with foolish left-wing thought but we know better. Obama didn�t discard the socialist nonsense when he reached 30. The following links from PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR BILL WARNER

Barack Obama Praised ‘Searing and Timely’ a Book by Bill Ayers in 1997 titled “A Kind and Just Parent: The Children of Juvenile Court” in Chicago and Obama is mentioned in the book.

Barack Obama, Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn are living in close proximity in Manhattan NY from about 1982 to at least 1984. Bernardine Dohrn moves to Chicago and from 1984 to 1988 Dohrn is employed by the prestigious Chicago Law firm Sidley & Austin, Bill Ayers apparantly stays at Columbia Univ. in New York City until Ed.D graduation in 1987. Michelle Obama joined Sidley & Austin as an associate in the fall of 1988. She had previously been a summer associate at Sidley & Austin�evidently in the summer of 1987 (when Dohrn was there).

Barack Obama entered Harvard Law School in late 1988, during his summers, he returned to Chicago where he worked as a summer associate at the law firm of Sidley & Austin from 1988 to 1989, this is the same Law Firm where Bernardine Dohrn, the Leader/Founder of the “Weatherman Group”, was already employed.

By 1995, it appears that Barack Obama had known Bill Ayers & Bernardine Dohrn at least eight years since Ayers and Obama shared involvement in the Alliance for Better Chicago Schools in 1987, Ayers did not leave Columbia Univ. NYC until mid 1987, it appears he travelled back and forth between Chicago and NYC, he got involved with the radical Alliance For Better Schools in Chicago, possibly through Dohrn ?….. The radical School reform movement had begun in 1987 in the wake of an unpopular strike by Chicago teachers. Bill Ayers was active in that reform effort through a group called the Alliance for Better Chicago Schools, or ABCs. ABCs was an alliance of various activists and reform groups that included the Developing Communities Project which Barack Obama headed up at the time as well as Chicago United, a business sector group, that was headed up by Thomas Ayers, father of Bill Ayers

Would we recognize a dangerous candidate? How? Especially how if the press decides because of petulance and personalities to avoid digging into a candidate for the Presidency. If we came face to face with something as outrageous as a Manchurian candidate would we believe our own eyes?

Is it so outrageous to believe that we have enemies, powerful enemies? Doesn�t anyone consider it a bit strange that Russia has a revolution and after it has been squeezed a bit out pops the former head of the KGB? Is that Change we can believe in?

Obama is profoundly disturbing but my faith in the American people is such that I believe they see what I see in him and he will lose. But my gosh where is the Press? They truly are our last defense and they have completely abdicated the field. What if he dupes the American people�what then? Are we left to hope that he will NOT follow his life�s philosophy and instead turn towards moderation? Once he is the President he really doesn�t need to fool anyone any longer.

Where is the goddamn press?

Pajamas Media � Eyewitness to the Ayers Revolution

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds

Stumble It!