Pink Flamingo Bar

Exactly how do we keep playing like Islam has something in common with Western Culture? Hey I love how folks try to mislead folks by saying Chaplin…it is no Chaplin but an Imam who is uttering this sort of trash. Shame on him, shame on Vanderbilt, shame on our country for letting this festering bullshit into our schools.

And we wonder how terrorists like the Christmas bomber and the Ft. Hood shooter get traction? We give it to them by inviting their teachers, the Imams, into our schools, homes, cities and towns.

Vanderbilt chaplain agrees that homosexuals should be killed

As a graduate of Vanderbilt Divinity School, I know that the university generally and its religion departments specifically fully embrace conceptually and practically gay rights. The teachings of the Jewish and Christian scriptures that say that homosexual practice is sinful are either simply ignored or reinterpreted by the professoriate. This is a very strong institutional value of the university.
So what are we alums to make of Awadh Binhazim, a Vanderbilt Muslim chaplain, who

publicly acknowledged what those of us who study shariah Islamic law know…, when pressed on whether or not shariah Islamic law requires the death penalty for homosexuals, asserted that yes, it does. Furthermore, he stated: "I don’t have a choice as a Muslim to accept or reject teachings." Sense of Events: Vanderbilt chaplain agrees that homosexuals should be killed

This is where this sort of “thought” brings them. A series of photos of the hanging in Iran of 2 homosexual boys.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad skirted a question about the treatment of homosexuals in Iran on Monday, saying in a speech at a top US university that there were no gays in Iran.

"In Iran we don’t have homosexuals like in your country," Ahmadinejad said to howls and boos among the Columbia University audience.

"In Iran we do not have this phenomenon, I don’t know who has told you that we have it," he said.

Bet ya dollar that this Imam still has a job at Vanderbilt come next week, next year and I bet that in 5 years he is running his own portion of the indoctrination of Vanderbilt Freshmen. After all we are embarrassed to defend our culture and the main religion that brought us to the pinnacle of achievement. Nature abhors a vacuum and Islam is more than willing to fill the gap left by the pitiful secularists we have left defending us.

Why shouldn’t they keep him after all President Bush our stalwart defender after 9/11 broke bread with terrorists shortly after 9/11.

Here is snippet from an old article of mine referencing a PJ Media blog about Islamic penetration into the DOD.

9/14/2001 President Bush plays patsy cake with Islamic “Leaders” at a Washington “Prayer” service for the victims of 9/11. The rubble is still smoking and President Bush has at his side, Abdurahaman Alamoudi who US Intelligence suspected of having ties to the people who knocked the buildings down in the first goddamn place. Our Islamic friend Abdurahaman goes on to be prosecuted for terrorist ties and is now serving time. But it gets even better! Also at our President’s side is Muzzammil Siddiqi the spiritual leader of the Islamic Society of Orange county and who had claimed an year earlier that the US deserved to be attacked for our ties.

Muzzammil had served as a translator for Blind Sheikh Omar Abdul-Rahman whilst he lectured about violent jihad. And since it can only get worse in attendance at these lectures were such terrorist luminaries as Adam Gadahn and Khalil Deek who were part of a Al Qaeda Sleeper cell operating in the States. 

And Bush is praying with these folks. Praying for what? Brains? Can you imagine how hard those “peaceful muslims” were laughing at our “Commander in Chief”?

So it is not a surprise at all that we should find DOD infiltrated with Islamic terrorists. Actually it is probably a lot worse than just a couple of Departments.

And because I am feeling especially generous let me include this bit of a blog from a long time ago in reference to those “youths” that are continuing to burn Paris down.

Was Muhammed an Islamist? Or was he a moderate?

As we watch one of the most beautiful countries in the world get torn apart by the sort of thuggery that has always seemed to be part of Islam I wonder would Muhammed have defined himself as an Islamist? How would President Bush describe Muhammed? Would he describe him as a moderate, peaceful man or would he describe him as an Islamist?

Surely Muhammed would describe himself as an extremist and isn’t that the definition of an Islamist ultimately? Or is the definition of an Islamist one who is strict in his interpretation of the Koran? What makes one an Islamist?

The Devil is in the details and exactly how is it possible to get the details correct if your definitions differ from the definitions offered by those you attempt to define? Meaning exactly how does one deal with Islam if one denies its definition of itself?

There is plenty of terrific reporting going on right now by people who understand the importance of the details. Brussels Journal is near the top along with ¡No Pasaràn! Some of my favorites are here, here which included a terrific offer of help for Chirac from Kadhafi, here “Wake up and Smell the Molotov Cocktails and here “Not that I’m on a crusade or anything — After all, the word might hurt someone’s feelings”.

The Fall of France | The Brussels Journal
Muhammed
Paris Burning
Paris Riots

If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds

Stumble It!