headermask image

header image

category archive listing Category Archives: Huckabee

John McCain 2008 - John McCain for President

June 10, 2008 –
Pierre Legrand’s Pink Flamingo Bar

This hurts me more than you can know…but the Angry Black Marxist Obama scares me. If Obama gets into office the he will make the Clinton’s look like Republicans. McCain is a bastard no doubt…no I won’t forgive him for his collaboration with Kennedy on Amnesty. But he is much less of a bastard than Obama.

Well anyway. I just gave to the Campaign and I hope you do to since McCain will need every penny he can get to blast through the media hype for Obama. Make no mistake every single media outlet will be working for the Obamamessiah Election committee.

John McCain 2008 - John McCain for President


By Pierre Legrand | Also posted in Fred Thompson, Mitt Romney, mccain | Comments (0)

Cross his heart hope to die, Obama promises he is not a liberal…okey dokey.

March 23, 2008 –

The left, bless their black little hearts, have never thought much of middle classes. That opinion underlies all of their philosophy. Indeed it is appealing, is it not, to consider that you are smarter than everyone you know, backseat drivers unite!…course the sane among us realize otherwise. The left, the mother of all backseat drivers.

Matter of fact the left has believed that you can indeed fool all of the people all of the time. Aren’t they cute? And who is cuter than the cutest of them all Barak Hussein Obama? Lookee here where Obama actually has the audacity to imagine that us rubes won’t know that “progressive” is just another word for really far left moonbat? In this interview he claims he is NOT a liberal…he is a progressive. Hmm…my mama didn’t raise no fool Hussein.

He said he was a progressive and a pragmatist, eager to tackle the big issues like health care and convinced that the Democrats could rally independents and disaffected Republicans to their agenda. Obama’s promise of a new majority, and the question it prompts - International Herald Tribune

But Obama is even funnier than that if you consider the attempted con job he has been trying to pull on the rest of the country. Consider his oh so heralded speech on race, which was actually an attempt to keep the Right Reverend Wright’s lunatics on board while giving willing fools a reason to believe that Obama really isn’t a white hating lunatic himself…no matter what he says about his Grandmother. He really thinks you are a dumbshit…ain’t that cute. Those leftists with their coincidental relationships with reality! Thank goodness that the Democrats are buying into this classic demagogues bullshit. Had they run a centrist candidate not out on the lunatic fringes they might have actually won the Presidency this year. Hell even Lieberman would have crushed McCain. You go girls.


By Pierre Legrand | Also posted in Crime, Family, Fred Thompson, Global Warming, Immigration, Mitt Romney, Politics, Voting fraud, health care, mccain, obama, ron paul | Comments (0)

Mark Levin fires back across the bow of Victor Davis Hanson and others…McCain is no Reagan and Reagan was no Moderate RINO.

February 2, 2008 –

As we all struggle with the inevitability of McCain’s nomination as the Republican Party Candidate for the Presidency some terrible misinformation is being spread around liberally. (Pardon the Pun) Mark Levin gets it exactly right in this post on the National Review Corner. As an aside it is heartening to see that some in the National Review have not forgotten what being a conservative is all about.

Reagan challenged his party from the Right. He sought the Republican nomination in 1968 against Richard Nixon and lost. He sought the nomination against Gerald Ford in 1976 and lost. He fought the Republican establishment in 1980 as well, including Bob Dole, Howard Baker, and George H. W. Bush, and won. McCain has challenged his party from the Left. I don’t know how many more times I and others have to lay out his record to prove the point. To put a fine point on it, when he had to, Reagan sought compromise from a different set of beliefs and principles than McCain. It does a great disservice to historical accuracy and the current debate to continue to urge otherwise. The Corner on National Review Online

To many Republicans are making the sorts of excuses regarding McCain that make me worry that we have lost our way. McCain is profoundly wrong in so many different areas that having folks compare him to Reagan tells me more about their version of principles than it educates me about why I should vote for McCain.

Here is Victor Davis Hanson giving us some of that McCain is just like Reagan love…yea I know that is not exactly what he is doing but it is close. Bullshit to that nonsense. Victor Davis Hanson has been going off into the wilderness lately.

Reagan, and Bush I and II all adjusted to that unfortunate reality. A Democrat did not appoint Souter, O’Connor, or Kennedy, nor raise payroll and gas taxes in the 1980s, nor sign amnesty and de facto open-border legislation in 1986, nor, later, increase federal spending well past the rate of inflation, or offer amnesty again in 2007. Tax cuts were great, but without caps on spending they were unfairly slurred as revenue reducers once deficits soared. Recent Republican congressional scandals mirror-imaged some of the Clinton-era roguery.

Reagan’s pragmatism on taxes, amnesty, new federal programs and government expansion, was continued by both Bush I and II. In that regard, McCain seems a continuum, not an abject disconnect. His problem is mostly temperament — when he strayed he was blunt about what he was doing and sometimes gratuitously offended his base in a way that neither Reagan nor the Bushes dared. That is a legitimate concern of tactical aptitude, but not one so much of ideology.

Back to Mark Levin setting that crap straight.

Let me be more specific, rather than spar in generalities. Reagan would never have used the phrase “manage for profit” as a zinger to put down a Republican opponent. Reagan believed in managing for profit because he believed in free enterprise. That doesn’t mean he didn’t agree to certain tax increases (after fighting for and winning the most massive tax cuts in modern American history), which were incidentally to be accompanied by even greater spending cuts.

McCain believes the oil companies are evil, and said it during one of the debates. Among his first acts as president, Reagan decontrolled the prices of natural gas and crude oil with the stroke of his pen because, as he understood, profit funds research and exploration. Reagan had a respect for and comprehension of private property rights and markets that McCain does not. There never would have been a Reagan-Lieberman bill, in which the federal government’s power over the private sector would have trumped the New Deal.

Reagan opposed limits on political speech. The Reagan administration ended the Fairness Doctrine and the media ownership rules, which helped create the alternative media that McCain despises. Reagan’s reverence for the Constitution would never have allowed him to support, let alone add his name to, something like McCain-Feingold.

So to all you Hanson’s, Simons and Anchoress’s out there, I call bullshit to the idea that we have to believe that McCain is not some big stinking pile of shit. I may indeed vote for this pile of shit because the other side of the aisle is a bigger pile of shit but both of them came from the same spot.


By Pierre Legrand | Also posted in Fred Thompson, Global Warming, Mitt Romney, Politics, Terror war, environmentalist, politcal corruption, ron paul | Comments (0)

Walid Phares endorses Mitt

February 2, 2008 –

Some say that McCain’s strongest point is his desire to take the war to the enemy. But to me Bush’s weakest point was the fact that he never properly identified his enemy. Neither has McCain.

Mitt on the otherhand has indeed identified Global Jihadism as the enemy and he did it a long time ago. When I heard him speak in Baton Rouge near the beginning of the race he was talking about Global Jihadism. Don’t we want someone who will take the battle to the enemy instead of reacting to the enemy? I do.

Here is Mr. Phares making that exact point.

Senator McCain says it is “Radical Islam,” and pledges to increase the current level of involvement. On Iraq, the former Navy Pilot says he will continue to fight till there are no more enemies to fight. To me that is a trenches battlefield: We’ll pound them till they have no more trenches. Governor Romney says the enemy is Global Jihadism, and it has more than the one battlefield of Iraq. And because the Jihadists are in control of regimes, interests and omnipresent in the region and worldwide, the US counter strategies cannot and should not be limited to “entrenchment” but to counter attacks, preemptive moves and putting allies forces on the existing and new battlefields. Besides not all confrontations have to be militarily. The difference in wording between the general term “radical Islam” and the focused threat doctrine “Jihadism” says it all. One leads to concentrate one type of power in one place, regardless of what the enemy is and wants to do, and the other concept lead to pinch the foe from many places on multiple levels and decide over the ending process of the conflict.

Political Mavens » The Candidate Who Can See the Enemy, Can Defeat It


By Pierre Legrand | Also posted in Blogs for Bush, Family, Iran, Iraq, Islam, Mitt Romney, Saddam Al Qaeda links, Terror war, ron paul | Comments (0)

Pulled the post on Norris Huckster because it was WRONG!

January 9, 2008 –

Dumbass me attributed it to American Spectator…nope not them, in fact they are running this big apologetic about the Huckster.  What utter bullshit, the man is dangerous.

Instead here is the post I consider to be the best post I have seen today.

The Chuckabee facts  by Chase Cooper

Fact: Chuck Norris is so pathetic that Jack Bauer tracked and killed him in only 21 hours, then took a three-hour nap.

Fact: According to the Arkansas Leader newspaper, Mike Huckabee, while governor of Arkansas, raised more taxes than Bill Clinton did while governor of Arkansas. His tax record is so bad that even the members of the Arkansas Republican Assembly chose to endorse Fred Thompson rather than Huck. When the Club for Growth, a prominent conservative anti-tax organization, sharply criticized his tax record, Huckabee responded by calling them the “Club for Greed.” There’s nothing greedy about the concept that the money you’ve earned belongs to you.

Fact: Mike Huckabee has little to no foreign policy experience. When confronted with this fact in an interview with Don Imus on Dec. 4, the Huckster stated, “I may not be the expert that some people are on foreign policy, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night.” If he likes Holiday Inn Express so much, I’d much rather he sleep there than at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

Fact: A Huckabee nomination would be disastrous to the conservative movement, the Republican Party and the United States of America, and the Democrats would almost certainly take the White House, regardless of who they nominate. If conservatism is to be advanced in the next four years, the Republican Party needs to chuck Huck - soon.


By Pierre Legrand | Also posted in Norris, Politics, Voting fraud, politcal corruption, ron paul | Comments (0)